Integrity through understanding, not accusation.
ScholarVera makes privacy-first tools for students and faculty. InForm checks APA 7 and verifies the sources behind the citations, without changing a word. WriteSight shows faculty how a paper came together, as a conversation, never a score.
Understand the scholarship. Understand the process.
InForm the scholarship
Citation quality, APA conventions, whether in-text citations and the reference list agree, and whether each cited source can actually be verified.
WriteSight the process
How a document was actually created over time, and which writing patterns may be worth a conversation rather than an assumption.
Neither writes the paper. Neither renders a verdict.
Formatting is only half the problem.
InForm is an APA 7 checker that lives inside Microsoft Word. It does not just ask whether a reference looks right. It checks whether the source behind it can actually be found.
- APA 7 guidance that names each issue and explains why it matters.
- Citation and reference matching, so in-text citations and the reference list stay in agreement.
- Source verification that checks cited works against the scholarly record and flags what cannot be found.
- Teach, don't fix. It names exactly what needs to change and leaves the writing itself alone.
Findings grouped by how certain they are, and every reference checked against the record.
The other half of the question.
InForm can tell you a source is real. It cannot tell you how the paper came together. WriteSight records the writing process inside the document itself, then gives faculty a readable view of it, without reducing any of it to a score or an accusation.
- Writing-process information captured as a document is written.
- A concise faculty view that turns that record into something readable at a glance.
- No integrity score. It surfaces what may be worth discussing, and leaves the judgment to the educator.
- Privacy by design. It records how the writing happened, not a copy of the writing itself.
- An open roadmap. What WriteSight becomes next is being worked out with the faculty piloting it.
WriteSight
Review how a document was written.
This document was mostly typed in place, built in 3 sessions.
How it was written
Writing timeline
Document size across active writing time (idle breaks removed). A steady climb is composing; a vertical cliff is a block appearing at once.
A faculty-facing report built to start a conversation, not to hand down a verdict.
Why ScholarVera
Teach, don't fix
Name what is wrong and why, then leave the change to the writer. The intellectual work stays with the person doing it.
Process, not verdicts
Give students and faculty information they can interpret. No automated accusations, no integrity scores, no black boxes.
Privacy by design
Collect only what a tool actually needs, and never turn a student's writing into a data asset. Restraint is built in, not promised.
For an academic-integrity company, restraint is not a slogan. It is the same principle our tools are built on, extended to the people who simply visit our site.
No ad tracking
We set no cookies, run no ad trackers, and build no profiles of visitors.
Privacy-first architecture
Our products are designed to hold as little of a student's work as the job allows.
Human judgment stays human
Tools surface information. People decide. We never render the verdict for you.
Built for higher education
Purpose-built for students, faculty, and programs, not repackaged from a generic SaaS.
Scholarly technology should help people do better work. Not write it for them. Not judge it for them.
That is the whole idea behind ScholarVera. InForm is on Microsoft AppSource now, and WriteSight is in pilot with faculty.